Scientonomy: The Challenges of Constructing a Theory of Scientific Change

Hakob Barseghyan, Paul Patton, Gregory Rupik, Jamie Shaw (Eds.)

by Hasok Chang (University of Cambridge), Kye Palider (University of Toronto), Hakob Barseghyan (University of Toronto), Jamie Shaw (University of Toronto), Karen Yan (National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University), Meng-Li Tsai (National Ilan University, Taiwan), Tsung-Ren Huang (National Taiwan University, Taiwan), William Rawleigh (University of Toronto), Patrick Fraser (University of Toronto), Guillaume Dechauffour (Sorbonne Université, France), Paul Patton (University of Toronto), Ameer Sarwar (University of Oxford), Deivide Garcia da S. Oliveira (Federal University of Recôncavo of Bahia, Brazil), Justin Donhauser (Bowling Green State University), David Stump (University of San Francisco)

Purchase this book
$ 84
Availability: In stock
currency displayed based on your location
(click here to change currency)

During the so-called ‘historical turn’ in the philosophy of science, philosophers and historians boldly argued for general patterns throughout the history of science. From Kuhn’s landmark "Structure of Scientific Revolutions" until the "Scrutinizing Science" project led by Larry Laudan, there was optimism that there could be a general theoretical approach to understanding the process of scientific change. This optimism gradually faded as historians and philosophers began to focus on the details of specific case studies located within idiosyncratic historical, cultural, and political contexts, and abandoned attempts to uncover general patterns of how scientific theories and methods change through time. Recent research has suggested that while we have learned a great deal about the diversity and complexity of scientific practices across history, the push to abandon hope for a broader understanding of scientific change was premature. Because of this, philosophers, historians, and social scientists have become interested in reviving the project of understanding the mechanism of scientific change while respecting the diversity and complexity that has been unveiled by careful historical research over the past few decades.

The chapters in this volume consider a particular proposal for a general theory of how scientific theories and methods change over time, first articulated by Hakob Barseghyan in "The Laws of Scientific Change" and since developed in a series of papers by a variety of members of the scientonomy community. The chapters consider a wide range of issues, from conceptual and historical challenges to the posited intellectual patterns in the history of science, to the possibility of constructing a general theory of scientific change, to begin with. Offering a new take on the project of constructing a theory of scientific change and integrating historical, philosophical, and social studies of science, this volume will be of interest to historians, philosophers, and sociologists of science.

List of Figures and Tables


Gregory Rupik, Hakob Barseghyan, Paul Patton, & Jamie Shaw
University of Toronto

Chapter 1 The Ontology of Scientific Practice
Hasok Chang
University of Cambridge

Chapter 2 Ways of Integrating HPS: Top-down, Bottomup, and Iterations
Kye Palider
University of Toronto

Chapter 3 Integrating HPS: What’s in it for a Philosopher of Science?
Hakob Barseghyan
University of Toronto
Jamie Shaw
University of Toronto

Chapter 4 Integrating Scientonomy with Scientometrics
Karen Yan
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Meng-Li Tsai
National Ilan University
Tsung-Ren Huang
National Taiwan University

Chapter 5 Reconceiving Scientific Mosaics: A New Formalization for Theoretical Scientonomy
William Rawleigh
University of Toronto

Chapter 6 Episodic Rationality in Scientific Change
Patrick Fraser
University of Toronto

Chapter 7 Thinking Big: The Science of Change and the Historicity of Scientific Method
Guillaume Dechauffour
Sorbonne Université

Chapter 8 Scientonomy and the Sociotechnical Domain
Paul Patton
University of Toronto

Chapter 9 General System-Theoretic Framework for Theories of Scientific Change
Ameer Sarwar
University of Oxford

Chapter 10 Pluralism in Scientonomy’s Mechanism of Compatibility: Incompatible Pluralism of Mosaics and Pluralism of Compatible Theories
Deivide Garcia da S. Oliveira
Federal University of Recôncavo of Bahia

Chapter 11 Historical Advances in Ecology
Jamie Shaw
University of Toronto
Justin Donhauser
Bowling Green State University

Chapter 12 The Relative A Priori as a Model of Radical Conceptual Change in Science
David J. Stump
University of San Francisco


Dr. Hakob Barseghyan is an assistant professor at Victoria College, University of Toronto. His research interests reside at the intersection of integrated history and philosophy of science and digital humanities. In 2015, Barseghyan proposed a general descriptive theory of scientific change that has since become the basis of a newly emerging empirical study of science, scientonomy. He developed a new academic workflow and implemented it by cofounding the online encyclopedia and the peer-reviewed journal of Scientonomy as digital means for a fruitful integration of the history and philosophy of science. Barseghyan currently leads a team of scholars that work on advancing our understanding of scientific change by developing a diagrammatic notation for visualizing worldviews, refining and propagating the new workflow, and creating a database of intellectual history.

Dr. Paul Patton is currently a research fellow at Victoria College, University of Toronto. He holds a doctorate in neuroscience from the University of Chicago, and has research experience concerning sensorimotor control, multisensory integration and the lateral line sense of blind cavefish. His philosophical research concerns the philosophy of perception, perceptual ‘directness’, and perspectival realism. Patton has published several articles on epistemic tools, authority delegation, and disciplinary dynamics in science. Patton is the co-editor-in-chief of the online encyclopedia of Scientonomy, and an editor of the journal of Scientonomy.

Gregory Rupik is completing his PhD in history and philosophy of science at the University of Toronto. His research explores the relevance of the 19th century German Romantics’ philosophy of biology for current organism-centered approaches to evolution theory. A founding member of the scientonomy community, Rupik has published and presented internationally on the topic of Scientonomy. Rupik is also an editor of the journal of Scientonomy.

Dr. Jamie Shaw is currently an SSHRC-sponsored postdoctoral fellow at the Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, University of Toronto. He completed his PhD in 2018 at the University of Western Ontario. His research interests fall within the history of philosophy of science and science funding policy. He has published numerous papers in top-tier journals and is the co-editor of an edited collection of papers on the philosophy of Paul Feyerabend. Shaw is also an editor of the journal of Scientonomy.

scientonomy; theory of scientific change; integrated history and philosophy of science; ontology of scientific change; mechanism of scientific change; laws of scientific change; case studies; pluralism; scientific practice; scientific methods

See also

Bibliographic Information

Book Title
Scientonomy: The Challenges of Constructing a Theory of Scientific Change
Number of pages
Physical size
236mm x 160mm
44 B&W
Publication date
February 2022