by Publication status
by SubjectAnthropology (10) Art (41) Business and Finance (19) Cognitive Science and Psychology (16) Communication and Journalism (12) Economics (88) Education (13) History (50) Human Geography (5) Interdisciplinary (8) Language and Linguistics (23) Law (2) Music Studies (2) Philosophy (74) Political Science and International Relations (37) Sociology (87) Statistics and Quantitative Methods (12)
by SeriesPhilosophy (22) Sociology (14) Education (11) Critical Perspectives on Social Science (8) Economics (8) Language and Linguistics (7) Cognitive Science and Psychology (6) Vernon Classics in Economics (6) Anthropology (6) Art (6) Politics (6) Business and Finance (5) Communication (5) Economic History (5) Philosophy of Religion (5) History of Art (5) Philosophy of Forgiveness (4) Cinema and Culture (4) Economic Development (4) Economic Methodology (4) World History (4) Philosophy of Personalism (3) Performing Arts (3) Series in American History (2) Series in Critical Media Studies (2) Series in Literary Studies (2) Economics of Technological Change (2) Law (2) History of Science (2) Curating and Interpreting Culture (1) Series in Built Environment (1) Series in Innovation Studies (1) Series in Social Equality and Justice (1) Series on Climate Change and Society (1) Music (1)
Pierre Islam, Yale University
Availability: Available 4 weeks
190pp. ¦ $60 £45 €51
Perplexing Patriarchies examines the rhetorical usage (and lived experience) of fatherhood among three African American abolitionists and three of their white proslavery opponents in the United States during the nineteenth century. Both the prominent abolitionists (Frederick Douglass, Martin Delany, and Henry Garnet), as well as the prominent proslavery advocates (Henry Hammond, George Fitzhugh, and Richard Dabney), appealed to the popular image of the father, husband, and head of household in order to attack or justify slavery. How and why could these opposing individuals rely on appeals to the same ideal of fatherhood to come to completely different and opposing conclusions? This book strives to find the answer by first acknowledging that both the abolitionists and the proslavery men shared similar concerns about the contested status of fatherhood in the nineteenth century. However, due to subtle differences in their starting assumptions, and different choices of what parts of a father’s responsibilities to emphasize, the black abolitionists conceived of an ideal father who protected the autonomy of his dependents, while the proslavery men conceived of one whose authority necessitated the subordination of those he protected. Finding that these differences arose from choices in starting assumptions and emphases rather than total disagreement on what the role of the father should be, this work reveals that black abolitionists were not radically critiquing the gender conventions of their day, but innovatively working within those conventions to turn them towards social reform. This discovery opens up a new way for historians to consider how oppressed peoples negotiated the intellectual boundaries of the societies which oppressed them: Not necessarily breaking entirely from those boundaries, nor passively accepting them, but ingeniously synthesizing a worldview from within their confines that still allowed for freedom and personal autonomy.
Pauline Sameshima, Lakehead University, Canada
$64 £48 €45
Parallaxic Praxis is a multi-modal, transmethodological research framework utilized by interdisciplinary teams to collect, interpret, transmediate, analyze, and mobilize data generatively. The term is used as a noun to refer to the model and also as a verb to describe the research practice. The methodology leverages the researchers’ personal strengths and the collective expertise of the team including the participants and community when possible. The reparative and residual research design benefits include the use of multi-perspective analysis, multi-modal investigations, informal and directed dialogic conversations, and innovative knowledge creation. Relying on difference, dialogue, and creativity propulsion processes; and drawing on post-qualitative, new materiality, multiliteracies, and combinatorial, even juxtaposing theoretical frames; this model offers extensive research possibilities across disciplines and content areas to mobilize knowledge to broad audiences. This book explains methods, theories, and perspectives, and provides examples for developing creative research design in order to innovate new understandings. This model is especially useful for interdisciplinary partnerships or cross-sector collaborations. Examples include possibilities for scholars doing projects in social justice, community engagement, teacher education, Indigenous research, and health and wellness. This book specifically addresses issues of research design, ethics of arts-integrated research, methodology, knowledge generation, mobilization, and dissemination for academics, students, and community partners. Examples include projects in social justice, community engagement, teacher education, Indigenous research, addictions, and health and wellness.
The need for common sense in 21st century mental health
João G. Pereira, Casa de Alba, Romão de Sousa Foundation, Portugal et al.
Availability: In stock
368pp. ¦ $66 £52 €57
This book intends to open the debate between three main aspects of clinical practice: psychotherapy (including psychological and philosophical influences), neurobiology and pharmacology. These three main themes are clinically applied in what we call the “Intervention Triangle”. The book will first focus on epistemologically distinct frameworks and gradually attempt to consider the integration of these three fundamental vertexes of practice. These vertexes are substantially unbalanced in the mental health field, and thus, this book tries to make sense of this phenomenon. Unique in its interdisciplinary and comprehensive view of mental health problems and approaches, this book offers a new perspective on unidisciplinary integration that previous publications have not considered. As an innovative contribution to its field, this volume will be particularly relevant to practitioners working towards integrative frameworks. It will also be of interest to students, clinicians and researchers, in particular, those working in psychology, medicine, psychiatry, philosophy, social work, and pharmacy.
This book argues that the mainstream definitions of corruption, and the key expectations they embed concerning the relationship between corruption, democracy, and the process of democratization, require reexamination. Even critics, who did not take the stable institutions and legal clarity of veteran democracies as a cure-all, assumed that the process of widening the influence on government decision making and implementation allows non-elites to defend their interests, define the acceptable sources and uses of wealth, and demand government accountability. This had proved correct, especially insofar as ‘petty corruption’ is involved. But the assumption that corruption necessarily involves the evasion of democratic principles and a ‘market approach’ in which the corrupt seek to maximize profit do not exhaust the possible incentives for corruption, the types of behaviors involved (for obvious reasons, the tendency in the literature is to focus on bribery), or the range of situations that ‘permit’ corruption in democracies. In the effort to identify some of the problems that require recognition, and to offer a more exhaustive alternative, the chapters in this book focus on corruption in democratic settings (including NGOs and the United Nations which were largely so far ignored), while focusing mainly on behaviors other than bribery.
Joana Antunes, Group of Multidisciplinary Studies in Art, CEAACP/Faculty of Arts and Humanities of the University of Coimbra, Portugal et al.
Availability: In stock
362pp. ¦ $66 £49 €56
The Centre as Margin. Eccentric Perspectives on Art is a multi-authored volume of collected essays that answer the challenge of thinking Art History, and the Arts in a broader sense, from a liminal point of view. Its main goal is thus to discuss the margin from the centre - drawing on its concomitance within study themes and subjects, ontological and epistemological positions, or research methodologies themselves. Marginality, eccentricity, liminality, and superfluity are all part of a dynamic relationship between centre and margin(s) that will be approached and discussed, from the point of view of disciplines as different and as close as art history, philosophy, literature and design, from medieval to contemporary art. Resulting from recent research developed from the privileged viewpoint offered by the margin, this volume brings together the contributions of young researchers along with the work of career scholars. Likewise, it does not obey a traditional or a rigid diachronic structure, being rather organized in three major parts that organically articulate the different essays. Within each of these parts in which the book is divided, papers are sometimes organized according to their timeframes, providing the reader with an encompassing (though not encyclopedic) overview of the common ground over which the various artistic disciplines build their methodological, theoretical, and thematic centers and margins. The intended eccentricity of this volume – and the original essays herein presented – should provide researchers, scholars, students, artists, curators, and the general reader interested in art with a refreshing approach to its various scientific strands.